The Examiner today carried an article saying we are fighting to retain the forest. They spoke to Dr Morley Singer; to someone at UCSF; and to Sean Elsbernd. They note Dr Singer’s point that this is a quarter of the forest, and once it is destroyed, the integrity of the whole is compromised because the trees support each other. They also note that UCSF plans more meetings in the fall. We hope that this will mean future Sutro Forest articles are less one-sided than those in the past.
SEARCH THIS SITE
PETITION TO UCSF: SAVE SUTRO FOREST
PETITION : Stop NAP, save the Forest
PETITION: Sierra Club, Please Stop!
LIKE us on Facebook
- Public Comments due Sept 22, 2017 on Sutro Forest DEIR
- Year 9 of Mission Blue Butterfly on Twin Peaks: Mixed Results
- Here it Comes: UCSF announces the Draft EIR for Sutro Forest
- Butterfly Count in San Francisco – 2017
- Ecological Novelty is Nature’s Future
- April Visit to Beautiful Sutro Forest
- Peter Ehrlich, 1948-2017
- Native Plant Restoration: “Someone Pays and Someone Profits”
- The Forest at the City’s Heart – Sutro Cloud Forest
- Forest- Bathing in Mount Sutro Cloud Forest
- Mt Sutro Forest: Nibbling at the Western Edge with Kirkham Heights Project?
- How Many Trees in Sutro Forest? And What Will be Left?
- Mt Sutro: UCSF’s Initial Study for the EIR Highlights Appalling New 2017 Plan
- Old Trees Trap More Carbon and Fight Climate Change
- Why “Thinning” Damages a Forest